Moral Motivation, Directions of Fit, and Some of Their Implications for Philosophy of Religion

سال انتشار: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: انگلیسی
مشاهده: 188

فایل این مقاله در 20 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JER-3-4_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 20 فروردین 1402

چکیده مقاله:

“Moral motivation” is one of the most important and widely used concepts in moral philosophy. Moral motivation is in close relation with two key terms in moral philosophy, i.e. “reasons for action” and “moral judgment”. People often do their actions with reasons, and motivational reasons are one of those reasons. People also make moral judgments, and “motivation” is what links judgments to actions. Philosophers of action agree that the agent must be motivated to do the action. A dominant theory among philosopher, known as “Humean theory”, considers two psychological states of “desire” and “belief” to be effective in motivating an agent to act. According to the “Humean theory” of motivation, “desire” is an intrinsically motivational state, with a world- to- mind direction of fit, and “belief” is an intrinsically cognitive state, with a mind- to- world direction of fit. Some moral philosophers deny the generality of Humean theory and consider at least some of our moral beliefs to be cognitive-motivational, with both two directions of fit. The view of the recent philosophers, in my mind, has the merit of being applied to religious beliefs as well. In this case, at least some of our religious beliefs and the statements expressing them should have both two directions of fit. Accepting this view, accordingly, will help us lead to new and two-faceted approaches to religious epistemology and religious language.

نویسندگان

محمدعلی عباسیان چالشتری

Associate Professor, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • Anscombe, G. E. M. (۱۹۵۷). Intention. Harvard University Press ...
  • Aquinas, Thomas. (۱۹۸۱). Summa Theologiae. (Trans. Fathers of the English ...
  • Bratman, Michael. (۱۹۸۷). Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: ...
  • Clack, Brian. (۱۹۹۹). An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Religion. ...
  • Dancy, Jonathan. (۲۰۰۰). Practical Reality. Oxford: Clarendon Press ...
  • Darwall, S. (۱۹۸۳). Impartial Reason. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press ...
  • Davidson, Donald. (۱۹۶۳). “Actions, reasons, and causes”. Journal of Philosophy, ...
  • _______. (۱۹۸۰). Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon ...
  • Dennett, D. C. (۱۹۷۱). “Intentional Systems”. Journal of Philosophy. ۶۸: ...
  • Descartes, Rene. (۱۶۴۱). Meditation on First Philosophy. (Trans. E. S. ...
  • Geivett, R. D. and Sweetman, B. (۱۹۹۳). Contemporary Perspective on ...
  • Goldman, Alvin. (۱۹۷۰). A Theory of Human Action. Englewood Cliffs, ...
  • Hick, John. (۱۹۸۶). “Theology and Verification”. In The Philosophy of ...
  • Horgan, T. & Timmons. (۲۰۰۰). “Nondescriptivist Cognitivism: Framework for a ...
  • _______, (۲۰۰۶). “Morality without Facts”. In Contemporary Debates in Mora/Theory. ...
  • Kant, I. (۱۹۶۵ [۱۷۸۱]) Critique of Pure Reason. (Trans. N. ...
  • Kierkegaard, Søren. (۱۹۹۲ [۱۸۴۶]). Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments. (Trans. ...
  • Lacewing, Michael. (۲۰۱۴). Philosophy for AS: Epistemology and Philosophy of ...
  • Malcolm, Norman. (۱۹۹۲). “The Groundlessness of Belief”, in Contemporary Perspective ...
  • McDowell, J. (۱۹۷۹). “Virtue and Reason”. Monist. ۶۲: ۳۳۱–۵۰ ...
  • McNaughton, D. (۱۹۸۸). Moral Vision. Oxford: Basil Blackwell ...
  • Millikan, R. G. (۱۹۸۴). Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. ...
  • Platts, M. (۱۹۷۹). Ways of Meaning. London: Routledge and Kegan ...
  • _______. (۱۹۸۰). “Moral Reality and the End of Desire”, in ...
  • Shafer-Landau, R. (۲۰۰۳). Moral Realism: A Defense. Oxford: Oxford University ...
  • Velleman, J. David (۱۹۸۹). Practical Reflection. Princeton: Princeton University Press ...
  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (۲۰۰۱ [۱۹۵۳]). Philosophical Investigations. (Trans. and Eds. G.E.M. ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع