مقایسه تفاوت لندمارک های آناتومیک دو تکنیک رادیوگرافی لترال سفالومتری دیجیتال و معمولی به روش ترسیم دستی در جمجمه های انسانی

سال انتشار: 1393
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: فارسی
مشاهده: 55

فایل این مقاله در 8 صفحه با فرمت PDF قابل دریافت می باشد

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این مقاله:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JMUMS-24-114_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 2 آبان 1402

چکیده مقاله:

Background and purpose: Digital radiography has led to many improvements in radiology. Despite many advantages there are different ideas in determining anatomical landmarks which results in some errors in cephalometric analyses. The aim of this study was to determine the degree of identification differences of anatomical landmarks by conventional and digital lateral cephalometric techniques using manual tracing of human skulls. Material and Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted in ۱۷ cases of human skulls in which metal radiopaque markers were attached to ۹ landmarks as follows: N, S, ANS, PNS, A, B, Pog, the most inferior point of lower mandibular border, and Go. Conventional and digital lateral cephalograms were obtained from each skull with and without markers. The two cephalograms without markers were traced for landmarks by three orthodontists. Any difference between these landmarks and those of cephalograms with markers, were recorded and analyzed by student t-test. Results: The level of differences in S point was not statistically significant along both x and y coordinates. The measurement differences for the ANS and PNS points obtained by both radiographic methods were significant along the x coordinate but not significant along the y coordinate. Also, the measurement differences for the most inferior point of lower mandibular border, A, B, and Go points along both x and y coordinates were observed to be statistically significant. The measurement difference obtained for the Pog point was significant along the y coordinate and non-significant along the x coordinate. Conclusion:The difference in landmark identification between the two digital and conventional lateral cephalometric techniques was statistically significant for some points on both dimensions, however, the difference was not clinically significant.

نویسندگان

فرزین اصلانی

علوم پزشکی مازندران

علی رضا عمرانی

علوم پزشکی مازندران

مسعود فیض بخش

علوم پزشکی مازندران

روشنک غفاری

علوم پزشکی مازندران

فرهاد ثبوتی

علوم پزشکی مازندران

مراجع و منابع این مقاله:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این مقاله را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود مقاله لینک شده اند :
  • McClure SR, Sadowsky PL, Ferreira A,Jacobson A. Reliability of digital ...
  • Nair MK, Nair UP. Digital and advancedimaging in endodontics: a ...
  • Wu DM, Wu YN, Guo W, Sameer S ...
  • Accuracy of direct digital radiography in thestudy of the root ...
  • Moshfeghi M, Sajadi SS, Sajadi S,Shahbazian M. Conventional versus digitalradiography ...
  • White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology:Principles and interpretation. ۶th ed. ...
  • Geelen W, Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E, Kruger M,Hansson LG. Reproducibility ...
  • Naoumova J, Lindman R. A comparison ofmanual traced images and ...
  • Jacubson A, Jacobson RL. Radiographiccephalometry: from basics to ۳-D imaging ...
  • ۲nd ed. Quintessence Pub Co; ۲۰۰۶. p. ۱۵-۶۰ ...
  • Turner PJ, Weerakone S. An evaluation ofthe reproducibility of landmark ...
  • Rueda S, Alcañiz M. An approach for theautomatic cephalometric landmark ...
  • Roden-Johnson D, English J, Gallerano R ...
  • Comparison of hand-traced and computerizedcephalograms: landmark identification,measurement, and superimposition accuracy ...
  • Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ۲۰۰۸;۱۳۳(۴): ۵۵۶-۵۶۴ ...
  • Chen YJ, Chen SK, Huang HW, Yao CC,Chang HF. Reliability ...
  • Chen YJ, Chen SK, Chang HF, Chen KC ...
  • Comparison of landmark identification intraditional versus computer-aided digitalcephalometry. Angle Orthod ...
  • Schulze RK, Gloede MB, Doll GM ...
  • Landmark identification on direct digitalversus film-based cephalometric radiographs:a human skull ...
  • Tng TT, Chan TC, Hägg U, Cooke MS ...
  • Validity of cephalometric landmarks. Anexperimental study on human skulls. Eur ...
  • Yu SH, Nahm DS, Baek SH. Reliability oflandmark identification on ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع